Saturday, February 25, 2012



Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall-street.

 Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall-street by, Herman Melville is Grim, yet almost comical telling of a man who has become an empty shell, one who has lost himself and his ambition not just in his occupation, but in life. As you begin to read the story of a dry, dull and gloomy man named Bartleby who comes to find work as a scrivener in a Wall-street law office as a copyist, you begin to realize that he is much more than just a key character in a story.  Bartleby’s character represents the deterioration of the work place, the toll the changing times have brought on us, and the emotions brought on by such changes. Throughout the story the narrator speaks of himself and acknowledges himself as part of the greater whole of a society who would rather hide behind closed doors, or go unnoticed than deal with adversity or trying issues. “Ah, happiness courts the light, so we deem the world is gay; but misery hides aloof, so we deem that misery there is none.” (Melville, par 89), as the narrator states, in short, he is simply saying we pretend all is well, when deep down all is not. Bartleby is not just a victim of circumstances of his own will but a representation of how most are truly feeling. Throughout the story you will see the almost intoxicating like affect that Bartleby has on his employer (the narrator), as well as the other scriveners in the story.

   The narrator's self-characterization in the story explains that he is a "safe" man. He is one who takes very few risks and tries above all to calculate and conform. He feels that the easiest paths in life are also the best. His priorities are that of the up most concerns of financial security and the ease of life. While working as a lawyer and dealing with other rich men’s legal documents, he has found himself very comfortable in the modern economy. This makes him an almost, opposite or mirror image to the offices’ new scrivener and they complement each other in numerous ways. In the bleak Wall-street officer of our narrator the other two scrivener characters, “Turkey” and Nippers” seem to mirror each other as well. Turkey, a rather large Englishmen, is productive in the office during the morning, but is drunk and useless in the afternoon. While Nippers on the other side is useless and disgruntle in the morning is quite productive in the afternoon. While these to characters have some differences, one being there age, they share a come task, that is bring some comic relief or value in a dull and upsetting scene.

   The story of Bartleby is one of corporate discontent and emptiness of modern business life. The description of the Wall-street office is descripted as a dark, somber and bleak modern dungeon. On one side of the office the window looks out on to a brick wall that resembles a blackened curtain and the other  a small isolated shaft of light fall into the office from between the high rise buildings above. The landscape of Wall Street is completely unnatural, and that is cut off from almost all of our natural surroundings. At night, this isolation from our surroundings also includes the absence of people. This work environment is sterile and cheerless, but most adopt it with varying degrees of success. Even though the narrator seems to be a successful man, he can also be viewed as a victim of circumstance and progress as his current position fell on him after his earlier position in law was illuminated, when it was no longer needed.

   As Bartleby is introduced and described in the story he is descripted as if he is a ghost or sad spirit.  Bartleby is described also as if he was a corpse or machine. He is pale from his work indoors, expressionless, motionless and cold. He lacks of human passion or compassion. The narrator describes him as a man who has been beaten and broken down from life and has lost all sense of happiness.  During the story the narrator ask Bartleby to do various simple and regular tasks around the office, the same as he expects from his other employees. Yet when these are asked of Bartleby, instead of obedience, he is met with a simple request that become famous of Bartleby, “I would prefer not to”. This was however, not seen as a simple act of defiance but a request of an exhausted and beaten man. This simple and very passive statement is one that seems to mesmerize the narrator and cast a spell over him. Throughout the story Bartleby seems to become more detached from his surrounds each time he “prefers not to” do something. He slowly becomes more phantom or sprit like throughout the duration of the story as he pulls farther away from his occupation and society. “Like a very ghost, agreeably to the laws of magical invocation, at the third summons, he appeared at the entrance of his hermitage" (par 19).

   While Bartleby’s characteristics are that of a good worker, they are also that of a machine; very constant, robotic and unwavering. It also seems that Bartleby has become a fixture at the office, constantly there with an almost haunting effect. These notions are only strengthened by the fact that it is found that Bartleby is living in the office and sleeps in the abandoned office on Wall-street at night. At first consistency seems to impress the narrator, but bartleby’s actions, or lack thereof begins to wear on him. The narrator begins to sense there are parallels between himself and Bartleby, in which the scrivener’s gloomy sadness affects him more and more. The scriveners character draws the narrator into depths of feeling that he was unaware he was capable of. A large portion of Bartleby's power over the narrator is that he somehow sees Bartleby as a part of himself. He sees that he has also been forced to adapt to the unforgiving business world. He feels while he has adapted and gone through the consequent numbing, Bartleby has also been pushed to exhaustion, to the point where nothing pleases him about this world and in at times the narrator to help Bartleby overcome his current state. The narrator feels a sense of obligation and compassion to help Bartleby because he is a living, suffering being, and that both men are "sons of Adam," the narrator arguably should do everything he can for him.

   After considerable attempts to ignore bartleby’s state and numerous attempts to help him the narrator becomes frustrated, feeling that he is inconveniencing bartleby’s life. He approaches the scrivener with money and tells him it is time for him to leave the office. Bartleby rejects the offer a states that he would “prefer not to” leave. The realization come to the narrator that Bartleby is a reflection of him, after learning to Bartleby had lost his Dead Letter office job due to a similar fate as his own. The narrator realizes that Bartleby was haunting the office as he was his old office suite. He finds himself returning to his old office which he refers to as his “old haunt”. It isn’t until after Bartleby is jailed and he comes to visit him that he realizes that they are one in the same. That they are a reflection of one another, victims of circumstances of the new business world. That they are as cold, bleak and empty as the office walls of wall-street that they both seem to haunt. In the world that the narrator thrived and one that exhausted Bartleby, I realize that Bartleby represents the deterioration of humanity in the unforgiving, constant, cold, caculating machine that is the business world.



Works Cited:



Melville, Herman. "Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall-street." Bartleby. N.p., 2011. Web. 19 Feb 2012. <http://www.bartleby.com/129/>. 


IMAGE LINK

INFO ON BARTLEBY AND HERMAN MELVILLE






Friday, February 17, 2012

Bartleby



“Nothing so aggravates an earnest person as a passive resistance. If the individual so resisted be of a not inhumane temper, and the resisting one perfectly harmless in his passivity; then, in the better moods of the former, he will endeavor charitably to construe to his imagination what proves impossible to be solved by his judgment. Even so, for the most part, I regarded Bartleby and his ways. Poor fellow! thought I, he means no mischief; it is plain he intends no insolence; his aspect sufficiently evinces that his eccentricities are involuntary. He is useful to me. I can get along with him. If I turn him away, the chances are he will fall in with some less indulgent employer, and then he will be rudely treated, and perhaps driven forth miserably to starve.”

After reading the story by Herman Melville, Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street, I began to scratch my head. This story is very difficult to comprehend and interpret and a reader must really try to read between the lines to find out what Melville was trying to convey. From what I could understand, this story is about a lawyer on Wall Street who employs several scriveners in his small office. It appears that this lawyer (who is also the narrator) seems intrigued by all the men he employs, giving full descriptions of them. He is most intrigued by a particular one of the four, Bartleby, due to his insistence of passive resistance, even to the most routine tasks. After the lawyer asks Bartleby to help him review a document, Bartleby replies “I would prefer not to.” This response surprises the lawyer, as he expected Bartleby to give complete obedience, seeing as how Bartleby was an excellent employee at first. It is hard to say if the lawyer feels bad for Bartleby, or feels pity, anger, or perplexity. What is known is that the lawyer cannot wrap his head around this strange scrivener he employs, yet he feels bound to keeping him, rather than firing him because he does not feel that he is being intentionally rebellious. I especially liked this passage because it really showed how the lawyer felt bound to Bartleby, even though he had shown disobedience to complete routine tasks. Overall, I was not a fan of this particular reading, but it was interesting and made me really have to work hard at comprehension.

Friday, February 10, 2012

Summary Vs Analysis


               Although there are distinct and clear cut differences between summary and analysis, the two are easily confused. Perhaps because it is easy to simply summarize a piece of literature, rather then get into the meat and potatoes of it and really dissect it. For whatever reason it may be, the main problem with summary versus analysis is that many do not fully understand the difference between the two.

                A summary is simply a recap of the material presented. When summarizing a story or piece of writing, you are simply retelling it in condensed form, highlighting critical and important parts. A summary gives the reader a chance to know what they are getting themselves into, without bias, opinion or argument. There can be no room for judgment or argument, because a summary simply puts the material out there, it does not dissect it in any way.

                An analysis is an interpretation and opinion of the material given. In analysis, an opinion or argument is given about the piece of writing based on facts and evidence about the piece. In an analysis, thought provoking dissection and evaluation is done, examining every detail and word to support the claim. An analysis takes much more thought and work then a summary, and is one’s own interpretation of the material.

                For me to describe summary versus analysis, let’s take the book Animal Farm by George Orwell. To summarize this book, I might say that it is a story about a bunch of animals on a farm who decide they are tired of being slaves to man. They overtake their farm by driving out their farmer Mr Jones.  After the animals take over, the pigs assume leadership. Over the course of the book, the pigs fight for power, one overthrows another and after years pass, the pigs begin to walk upright and carry whips and form an alliance with humans. At the end, the other animals cannot tell the difference any longer between the faces of the pigs and humans because they all look alike.  In this summary, no argument can be made because I am simply explaining what the book is about, I am not making a claim or judgment about the book. In an analysis, I might say that the author, George Orwell wrote Animal Farm to show his readers what happens politically in organizations and how easily it’s members can be manipulated. In my analysis, I would show evidence of my claim and perhaps give some history and insight as to the timeframe of this book, the background of Geroge Orwell and his political views at the time. One could easily argue my opinion, saying he did not want write Animal Farm for this reason. An analysis goes far beyond a summary.   
Image Link
For more information about summary versus analysis

Saturday, February 4, 2012

-A MODEST PROPOSAL-


The essay “A MODEST PROPOSAL” by Dr. Jonathan Swift is a look at the debilitating poverty levels in Ireland that was continuing to spiral out of control during the 1700’s. In his essay Swift proposes that poverty could be controlled, in a very unconventional, yet cost effective way. As you begin to read his proposal to rid poverty in the “Kingdom” , Ireland by selective breeding and using the infants and children of starving families from the dirty streets as a food source for the rest of the country, you cannot help yourself but to cringe and chuckle to yourself a bit, while telling yourself, swift must be joking about his answer to a serious problem. In my opinion, Swift is using a very extreme alternative to an issue that had, at the time, been plaguing Ireland for quite some time. Many others had proposed plans to rid Ireland of the over population and poverty with little or no prevail.  Jonathan Swift was simply trying to wake his country up to the fact that something needs to be done, That they (the people of Ireland), are not just low maintenance animals, sheep or livestock as he so cleverly compared us to in his essay, but that they are a civilized society with a problem that needs to be handled in a more humane manner. I feel that Swift was using an extremely sarcastic read to spark a fire in the back of the mind of the people of the time to begin to a balance to the poverty level and to put more food on the tables of the hungry.

IMAGE LINK

ABOUT Dr. SWIFT